what was the catalyst to begin mass production of medicine

This report is a summary from a presentation at a regional healthcare conference by Brent James, M.D., clinical professor at Stanford University of Medicine and former vice president and chief quality officeholder at Intermountain Healthcare.

In 2018, the quality of patient care falls far short of its theoretical potential. Massive variation in clinical practices undermines the goal of good care for all patients. High rates of inappropriate care where the risk of harm is inherent in the treatment can outweigh any potential benefit. This leads to preventable intendance-associated patient injury and death due to a hitting inability to practise what we know works.

Additionally, variations in care generate huge amounts of waste matter across all segments of healthcare systems, leading to spiraling prices that can limit patient access to affordable intendance. This challenge has existed for decades, but lean healthcare management principles offer a solution.

Healthcare systems that adopt lean principles can reduce waste product while improving the quality of care. By applying rigorous clinical information measurement methods to routine care delivery, these systems identify prove-based best practice protocols and blend those into the clinical workflow. Data from these all-time practices are and so fed back through a continuous-learning loop that enables healthcare teams across organizations to constantly update and improve the protocols, ultimately reducing waste, lowering costs, and improving access to care and patient outcomes.

The goal of this report is threefold:

1. Illustrate how lean healthcare principles can help improve quality of care.
2. Introduce the steps needed to create shared baseline protocols using embedded data systems to establish a continuous-learning loop.
3. To demonstrate the financial leverage a lean approach offers past eliminating waste material and improving internet operating margins and return on investment.

Healthcare'southward Need for Lean Methods: Five Factors

There are some basic tensions inherent in the business of healthcare. Clinicians often focus on patient outcomes, regardless of toll. The financial office, on the other hand, responds, "No money, no mission." Healthcare is withal a business.

To resolve that dynamic tension, healthcare systems take tried several approaches. In the 1980s, healthcare organizations used Activity-Based Costing (ABC) systems that had been successful in other industries. At the same time, The Dartmouth Atlas, developed past Jack Wennberg, worked to measure and identify significant geographic variations in care.

In 1986, Intermountain Healthcare localized the otherwise broad approach of the Dartmouth Atlas within its own healthcare system, incorporating ABC principles along the way. Intermountain's Quality, Utilization and Efficiency (QUE) studies applied rigorous clinical research methods to routine care commitment performance in six clinical areas at the health organisation's inpatient facilities on a local level. And yet the QUE studies still identified massive variations among physicians and care teams, even though they all were post-obit Intermountain's best care protocols.

Variations in care be both on wide geographic calibration and on more localized levels. Five factors contribute to this variation, and each provides opportunities for great improvement.

1. Meaning variation in clinical practices. Standardization in treat every individual patient is however most incommunicable, given the variation in access to healthcare. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was designed to increase access to care by theoretically guaranteeing care to everyone. But in reality, admission to care varies across the spectrum. In fact, Wennberg made the compelling case that where a patient goes to receive intendance is more important than whether she has insurance—dramatically so. This implies that healthcare professionals don't necessarily agree on best practices.
2. Loftier rates of inappropriate care. When the risk of harm inherent in a treatment outweighs the potential benefit, it can rightly be called inappropriate. A Rand study found that this was the example in an astounding 32 percentage of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy procedures. In another study, The Courage Trial of Cardiovascular Medicine, half of all cardiac stenting was identified as clinically inappropriate.
3. Unacceptable rates of preventable intendance-associated patient injuries and deaths. In a profession aiming to "Showtime, exercise no harm," research shows 210,000 preventable deaths each twelvemonth in the U.Southward. alone. Hospitals are truly a public health problem; medical errors are the tertiary leading cause of expiry in the U.S.
4. An inability to follow best practices. Anything that is powerful enough to heal can as well damage. In 2003, Elizabeth McGlynn of Kaiser Permanente took a list of recommended intendance processes and evaluated if that care was provided to eligible patients in 12 major metropolitan areas. She found that adults surveyed received only 54.nine percent of these recommended processes. Healthcare professionals are constantly walking a very sparse line between health and harm; there is a strong demand to more than accurately identify, then continuously implement proven methods.
5. Waste material. All of this adds upward to huge amounts of waste in healthcare, leading to spiraling prices that continue to limit access to care. Co-ordinate to the National University of Medicine, betwixt 35 and 50 percent of all money spent on care commitment today in the U.S. is technically waste product. Whether the waste results from building unusable products, providing unnecessary treatments, or simple inefficiency, it adds no value from a patient's perspective. With the U.S. spending $three.half dozen trillion annually on the delivery of healthcare, as much equally $2 trillion of that corporeality may be quality-associated waste.

This last factor is critical to the survival of healthcare systems. In the average system, a internet operating income drop below three percent can cause failure. The response of many healthcare systems is to build more hospitals, convalescent surgical centers, imaging centers, etc. But the financial leverage that the "build mentality" can deliver via increased revenue is just a five to nine per centum contribution for each caseadded. By contrast, the financial leverage from waste elimination is a 50 to 100 percent contribution to margin for each instanceavoided.

A lean healthcare approach helps organizations generate that financial leverageandameliorate the quality of care past emphasizing a clinical management method.

The Evolution from Craft-Mode Models of Intendance to Guidelines

"The complexity of mod medicine exceeds the capacity of the unaided proficient mind."
– David Eddy, Stanford University

At the start of the 20^th century, medicine evolved into a craft-mode model to address the complexity of care at that time. Physicians and nurses were experts, with all the testify, experience, and retentiveness stored in the human being mind. When the craft model was introduced, information technology worked quite well, producing dramatic improvements in care.

More than a century later, advances in medical science have sparked a quantum jump in understanding of the human organism, health, and disease. The industry has generated petabytes of new evidence, processes, and procedures. But the sheer volume of new information exceeds the capacity of the unaided expert heed to quickly summate all the variables in a clinical setting.

To address this evolution of medical knowledge beyond the arts and crafts stage, healthcare, like many other industries, turned to guidelines. The challenge with guidelines is always variation (in technology, patients, and caregivers). Demonstrating this concept, a National Institutes of Health-funded (NIH) report in 1991 identified large variations in ventilator settings beyond and within groups of skilful pulmonologists. The claiming was the complexity within the lab; there are as many equally 40 factors to consider when setting a ventilator. However, studies show that the maximum number of factors an expert clinician tin consider at i time is 9.

When the NIH issued the written report, the literature on ventilator settings offered evidence for a best practice in only about twenty percent of the cases. In the other lxxx percent of cases, doctors and nurses had to make up one's mind what was best on their own, because there was no prove and therefore no best practise. Even when expert consensus is accomplished, success still depends on clinicians remembering that data correctly.

The Problem of Guidelines in Healthcare

That is the fallacy of guidelines. A one-size-fits-all approach is untenable when every patient, every doctor, every nurse, every clinical setting is dissimilar. This has been proven in many studies:

• Level i, 2, or 3 evidence is available just about 15 to 25 per centum of the time.
• Experts cannot accurately estimate rates relying on subjective recall.
• Best do guidelines tin vary based on the specialty or individual level of the providers.
• Systems that rely on homo memory execute correctly only half the time(McGlynn: 55 percent for adults, 46 percent for children)
• No 2 patients are the same; therefore, no guideline perfectly fits whatsoever patient (with very rare exceptions).

Half-dozen Steps to Mass Customization in Healthcare

Rather than rely solely on guidelines, healthcare systems should use a clinical management method to develop shared baseline protocols. This is the healthcare-specific version of what is known in lean terminology equally "mass customization." In other industries, mass customization combines the low unit costs of mass product processes with the flexibility of private customization. In healthcare, there are 6 steps to this approach:

1. Place a high-priority clinical process.
2. Build an evidence-based best exercise protocol. It's important to note that this is always imperfect, due to poor evidence and the unreliability of a consensus approach to the best exercise, but those issues are resolved after.
3. Blend the protocol into the clinical workflow to avoid dependence on human retention (oft referred to as clinical determination support). This makes the idea of "best intendance" the lowest energy land for doctors and nurses, a default choice that happens automatically unless someone must modify it due to other factors.
4. Embed information systems to track both protocol variations and brusk and long-term patient results (i.eastward., intermediate and final clinical, cost and satisfaction outcomes).
5. Demand that clinicians vary their use of the protocol based on private patient need. This is the customization element now that the mass production process for the guidelines has been established by Steps 1 through 4.
6. Feed information on variations and outcomes dorsum in a lean-based continuous-learning loop that constantly updates and improves the protocol.

With this mass customization approach, it'south important to accept a "thinking mind" at the interface. This is someone who understands that no two individuals are alike and adjustments need to be made appropriately. Variation in and of itself is neat, but the central toeffectivevariation is standardization. Standards are established on the front end so people can vary around them, then feed that information back through the learning loop to continuously improve the protocol. No longer a standard "best practice," the protocol becomes an iterative process that constantly improves and communicates the rationale for those improvements with other care squad members.

The Continuous-Learning Loop and Developing New Insights

Every bit teams use the mass customization approach to developing and sharing all-time protocols, team members must understand they will be scrutinized for applying a protocol likewise much compared to peers who are applying it too picayune. As the variation is examined in the continuous loop, for divergent squad members, either the protocol has something to teach them, or they may have something to teach the rest of the team. It'southward amazing how oftentimes it is the latter, with team members developing new insights. That is how improvements are made.

When this iterative process is used, protocols may change fairly rapidly. This happened in a ventilator protocol compliance study in 16 large academic medical centers in the U.Southward. The original protocol, developed with input from those participants, was a flow chart over xl pages long, with twenty decision nodes per page. Iv months later, subsequently applying the lean feedback loop, more than 125 changes were made in the all-time practice protocol without a single patient achieving full compliance. The chance of survival for the about serious patients increased from 9.5 pct to 44 percent–a startling improvement in clinical outcomes. This same protocol is now used in several hundred large intensive care units around the globe, and to this solar day, non a single patient has accomplished 100 percent compliance. Nor should they. Each patient is different. That's the value of a learning healthcare arrangement. Clinicians can hold theory against reality and validate the best care through a truthful learning environment.

While delivering best intendance is the primary goal, the mass customization approach also impacts costs and productivity. In the example of the ventilator, using data to vary the employ of the ventilator based on patient need resulted in cost savings of 25 percent. The structure helped decrease doctor time to manage the composed cases while doctor productivity increased past 50 per centum.

Lean Lessons for Healthcare

Healthcare systems that attach to a lean arroyo acquire 4 crucial lessons:

1. They count their successes in lives. While the healthcare manufacture as a whole is withal falling far short of the miracles within reach, with a lean approach to care delivery, patient outcomes can be dramatically better. This is a transformative approach to healthcare that is starting to drive the profession and industry ahead in dramatic ways.
2. In that location is zip new hither, except the idea that it takes a team and better process-aligned data systems. The healing professions have used a team-based lean healthcare approach for at to the lowest degree 60 years, without giving it a fancy name or trying to sell it as a consulting service. Healthcare professionals intuitively adopted the thought that agreed-upon standards enable effective customization based on patient need. What is unlike is the ability to utilise data systems to drive transparency so everyone can learn and benefit from others' constructive variations. Moreover, the focus on patient-centered care requires organizations to think in terms of intendance processes. Quality improvement, the scientific discipline of managing these processes more effectively, allows a more robust approach to population wellness that emphasizes toll-effective preventive intendance over more expensive rescue intendance.
3. Most ofttimes, better care is cheaper care. Quality, toll, and access make up the Iron Triangle of healthcare delivery. In an manufacture with small-scale margins, cheaper care means a ameliorate bottom line. But without access to care, quality care is meaningless. And, accessible doesn't just mean a patient tin can walk in the door; it also means that intendance is affordable for the people in an organisation'due south communities.
4. The long-term organizational viability of clinical quality improvement strategies requires aligned financial incentives. Consolidations, mergers and acquisitions, and vertical integration continues to dominate the healthcare business news. This is an unstoppable force, especially in an industry where at that place is every bit much as $ii trillion in waste left sitting on the table. There's always a consolidator that will extract that waste from the organization, so it pays to be lean at present, both for the long-term wellness of the organisation and for the future of healthcare overall.

The Survival of Healthcare Organizations Depends on Applying Lean Principles

Systems that can leverage lean management principles to reduce waste while improving the quality of care will be better positioned to survive and thrive in healthcare going forrard. The healthcare organizations that accept leveraged lean systems have accomplished success past applying rigorous clinical data measurement methods to routine care commitment performances. This iterative process not only improves protocols and quality of care, but too explains to other members of the care team the rationale for those improvements, so they tin farther improve.

It is through this dynamic, data-based learning loop that lean management offers the all-time opportunity for healthcare systems to shape a amend hereafter for their systems through waste reduction, lower costs, and improved access to care and patient outcomes.

---

PowerPoint Slides

Would yous like to use or share these concepts?  Download this presentation highlighting the key principal points.

Click Here to Download the Slides

wolfehessium.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.healthcatalyst.com/insights/lean-healthcare-methodologies-improvement/

Share this post